AI Answer Claim Hierarchy Proof Checklist

Use this asset when

This Revneey golden-template asset improves review/comparison quality before the pattern is migrated into the 11-site matrix.

Every primary claim, secondary claim, and caveat records buyer segment, evidence URL, counter-evidence URL, screenshot/archive path, captured date, owner, severity, confidence, and next audit date.
AI answers, snippets, FAQs, schema, comparison rows, verdicts, and CTAs preserve the same claim priority and do not promote weak evidence into headline-level promises.
Buried caveats, exaggerated secondary benefits, contradictory table/verdict wording, or CTA overclaims trigger hierarchy review before deployment.
Reports include hierarchy gap, buyer risk, revenue risk, required rewrite, proof need, escalation owner, and monitoring cadence.
Matrix migration waits for vertical-specific claim hierarchy examples.

Operator output

Dated evidence, source, summary, citation, confidence, and owner fields.
Keep, qualify, reorder, narrow, rewrite, remove, monitor, replace source, expire, escalate, or migrate-safe decision.
Disclosure, snippet, schema, FAQ, CTA, AI-answer, claim hierarchy, warranty remedy, comparison-table, and refresh-cadence notes.

Matrix guardrail

Keep this pattern on Revneey first. Migrate only after vertical keyword boundaries are confirmed, and do not overwrite keyofvenus or cosyhomer slim directories.

Back to checklists